Court decisionSource checked
E-08557 Concurring and Dissenting Opinion: Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen — Official PDF
G.R. No. E-08557 — Promulgated October 14, 2026 · 2026 · Supreme Court 2026 / Separate opinion
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
SCANNED TEXT · CHECK ORIGINAL WORDING · DIGITAL P. 9 / 16
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion 9 G.R. No. E-08557
When barangay voters cast their ballots, they enter a covénant.*? They
exercise their right of suffrage with definite legal consequences.
Unlike a contract, which ordinarily arises from private agreement
between parties, an election is a public act through which the sovereign people
confer authority upon their chosen. representatives. Through this act, the
electorate entrusts the exercise of governmental authority to particular
officials for a period prescribed by law. In turn, the candidate elected assume
office pursuant to the same legal framework. Those terms are supplied by law
on election day, including the period of an official’s term of office. The
duration of the term’ is‘ therefore ‘significant, as it defines the petiod ‘Within
which the electorate expects its chosen representatives to exercise public
authority before they are afforded another opportunity to elect the next set of
officials.
In Macalintal v- Commission on Elections; the Court called the
exercise of the right to vote “the act of the people freely and consciously
consenting to surrender a portion of their sacred rights and liberties to those
who will temporarily exercise the powers that inviolably belong to them.”
The temporary character of this authority bears emphasis.
The same decision adopted Justice Isagani A. Cruz’s description of a
republican government, wherein public functionaries serve “for a limited
period only, after which they are replaced or retained, at the option of their
principal.”3*
i i : to. ‘ 1
The prerogative to replace or retain elected officials thus ultimately
belongs to the principai—the electorate. 1. respectfully submit that a
legislative measure extending an incumbent’s tenure takes that option from
the sovereign people without asking them at all. ‘
The distinction between term and tenure leads to the same conclusion.
The term of an office is “the time during which the officer may claim ws
to hold the office as of right[.]’?° For an elective officer, the right has one
3! The word is used in the sense the social contract tradition gives it: the compact by which a people
constitutes authority over itself. Nothing in this opinion depends on the private-law incidents of contract.
32 943 Phil. 212 (2023) [Per J. Kho, Jr., Ex Banc].
33° Id. at 237.
34 Id. at 225, citing J. Puno, Concurring Opinion in Frivaldo v. COMELEC, 327 Phil. 521 (1996) [Per J.
Panganiban, En Banc}, citing further ISAGANi CRUZ, PHILIPPINE POLITICAL Law. 49 (1991 ed.).
35 Tepacio Nueno v. Angeles, 76 Phil. 12, 21 (1946) [Per J. Feria, En Banc], as cited in Kida v, Senate, 675
Phil. 316 (2011) [Per J. Brion, En Banc]. The full passage in Kida reads: “[T]he ‘term’ means the time
during which the officer may claim to hold the office as of right and fixes the interval after which the
several incumbents shall succeed one another, while the ‘tenure’ represents the.term during which the
incumbent actually holds the office[.]” (Citation omitted)
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.