Court decisionSource checked
Romulo B. Macalintal v. Office of the President, et al. — Decision — Official PDF
G.R. No. E-08557 — Promulgated October 14, 2026 · 2026 · Supreme Court 2026 / Decision or signed resolution
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
SCANNED TEXT · CHECK ORIGINAL WORDING · DIGITAL P. 12 / 33
Decision 12 G.R. No. E-08557
With these parameters in mind, the Court turns to the substantive
issues.
IV. Republic Act No. 12326 is a term-
fixing law to which the 2023
Macalintal guidelines do not apply
The determination of a law’s fundamental character begins with its
text. In 2025 Macalintal, the Court distinguished Republic Act No. 12232
from the election-postponement laws that preceded it, including Republic
Act No. 11935, which was struck down in 2023 Macalintal. We noted that
Republic Act No. 12232 is titled as an act “setting” the term of office of
barangay officials, not one “postponing” an election; that it does not amend
Republic Act No. 9164, as the postponement laws did; that it prescribes a
new term for BSK officials, whereas the postponement laws retained the
three-year term; and that it sets a new interval between elections. On these
bases, the Court held that Republic Act No. 12232 is fundamentally a term-
setting law, and that “since Republic Act No. 12232 is not primarily an
election postponement jaw, the Macalintal 2023 guidelines become
inapplicable.
Each of these markers appears in Republic Act No. 12326. Its title
describes it as an act “Fixing the Term of Office of Barangay Officials and
Members of the Sangguniang Kabataan to Five [] Years.” It amends
Republic Act No. 12232, a term-setting law, and not Republic Act No.
9164. it changes the term structure: it lengthens the term from four to five
years and reduces the consecutive-term limit for barangay officials from
three terms to two. It sets a new five-year interval between elections. its
principal purpose, as gleaned from its text, is to fix the term of barangay
and SK officials. Setting the next BSKE for November 2028 implements
the new term, and is not an independent objective. The rest of the provisions
of Republic Act No. 12326 confirm this. Section 4-B, inserted by Section 4
of Republic Act No. 12326, directs the institutionalization of training and
capacity-building programs for barangay and SK officials “[c]onsistent
with the [five-year] term of office established under this Act.”?8
Macalintal seeks to show otherwise by pointing to news reports that
headlined the law as one that “postpones” the BSKE, and to the explanation
given at a media briefing when the signing of the law was announced.’
These do not alter the character of the law. What a law is depends on what
it says and what it principaily seeks to accomplish, not on how it is
described in the press.
28 Republic Act No. 12326, sec. 4.
2) Petition, pp. 2-3, 19-20.
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.