Court decisionSource checked
Romulo B. Macalintal v. Office of the President, et al. — Decision — Official PDF
G.R. No. E-08557 — Promulgated October 14, 2026 · 2026 · Supreme Court 2026 / Decision or signed resolution
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
SCANNED TEXT · CHECK ORIGINAL WORDING · DIGITAL P. 6 / 33
Decision 6 G.R. No. E-08557
Sec. 7. Appropriations. — The amount necessary to implement
the provisions of this Act shall be included in the General Appropriations
Act.
Any unexpended balance of the appropriations authorized for the
conduct of the barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan elections shall-be
deemed continuing appropriation of the COMELEC and shall remain
available as funding source to cover the preparatory activities for the
2028 National and Local Elections and such other lawful expenditures
and purposes as may be determined by the Commission.
Sec. 8. Separability Clause. — If any provision or part of this Act
is declared unconstitutional, the remainder hereof not otherwise affected
shall remain in full force and effect.
Sec. 9. Repealing Clause. — All laws, acts, decrees, executive
orders, issuances, rules and regulations, or parts thereof which are
contrary to and inconsistent with the provisions of this Act are hereby
repealed, amended, or modified accordingly.
Sec. 10. Effectivity. — This Act shall take effect immediately
after its publication in the Official Gazette or in a newspaper of general
circulation.
On September 25, 2026, the COMELEC issued Minute Resolution
26-0842 which resolved to approve the cessation of all activities related to
the November 2026 BSKE by virtue of Republic Act No. 12326, including
activities such as the filing of certificates of candidacy and the printing of
ballots.
On September 27, 2026, Macalintal filed the present Petition as a
voter, taxpayer, and practicing lawyer with an actual and material legal
interest in the subject of this petition. He alleges that this Court disregarded
the 2023 Macalintal guidelines in upholding the validity of Republic Act
No. 12232, and that Congress did the same when it enacted Republic Act
No. 12326.
Specifically, he puts forward the following arguments in support of
his Petition:
bt
Republic Act No. 12326 infringes the electorate’s right of suffrage
by postponing the November 2026 BSKE under the guise of fixing
terms.
Ii. The postponement does not satisfy the Macalintal guidelines and
substantive due process.
TI. Republic Act No. 12326 is an ELECTION POSTPONEMENT
LAW, disguised as a “term-fixing” law and is unconstitutional
because the holdover mechanism applied to incumbent barangay
officials constitutes legislative appointment in violation of the
constitutional provision that they must be elected and NOT
appointed.
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.