Court decisionSource checked
Romulo B. Macalintal v. Office of the President, et al. — Decision — Official PDF
G.R. No. E-08557 — Promulgated October 14, 2026 · 2026 · Supreme Court 2026 / Decision or signed resolution
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
SCANNED TEXT · CHECK ORIGINAL WORDING · DIGITAL P. 8 / 33
Decision 8 G.R. No. E-08557
that the reasons offered for the law are superficial; and that the new election
date, the hold-over, and the extension of terms are prohibited riders.7
On October 8, 2026, Jupiter Stalin M. Larida (Larida), the incumbent
Punong Barangay of Barangay Kabangbang, Bantayan (Island), Cebu, filed
a Motion for Leave of Court to Intervene and to Admit Attached Comment-
in-Intervention, with the Comment-in-Intervention. He alleges that he was
elected to and assumed the position in December 2023, and that the
“affirmation of constitutionality or declaration of the unconstitutionality of
[RA] 12326 could either favorably or adversely affect the status of the
Intervenor as a Punong Barangay.”"
Larida prays for the dismissal of the petition, arguing that the Petition
raises no genuine issue of constitutionality, as it questions neither the
mandate of Congress to change the term of office of barangay and SK
officials nor the authority of the President to sign Republic Act No. 12326
into law; that, consistent with 2025 Macalintal, the primary purpose of
Republic Act No. 12326 is to fix the term of office of barangay and SK
officials, not to postpone the November 2026 BSKE; and that the Petition
merely seeks an explanation for a matter that falls within the wisdom of the
legislative and executive branches.!> He adds that a five-year term benefits
both the officials and their constituents, as it gives officials sufficient time
to implement their plans, programs, and projects, and to familiarize
themselves with the preparation of the Annual Barangay Budget and the
formulation of the Barangay Development Plan.!®
Issues
The issues for resolution are:
1. Whether direct resort to the Court is proper, and whether the
requisites for the exercise of judicial review are present;
2. Whether Larida should be allowed to intervene;
3. Whether the determination of the term of office of barangay
officials is a political question beyond judicial review;
4. Whether Republic Act No. 12326 is an election-postponement
law subject to the guidelines laid down in 2023 Macalintal;
8 Id. at2-9.
“Motion for Leave of Court to Intervene und to Admit Attached Comment-in-Intervention, p. 1.
5 Comment-in-intervention, pp. 1-5.
6 Id. at 6-11.
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.