DILG legal opinionSource checked
Implementation of DILG-NYC Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2024 on filling vacancies in the Sangguniang Kabataan
DILG Opinion No. 122, s. 2025 · 2025 · DILG legal opinions — verified official source
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
SCANNED TEXT · CHECK ORIGINAL WORDING · DIGITAL P. 1 / 4
BAGONG PILIPINAS
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
DILG-NAPOLCOM Center, EDSA cor. Quezon Avenue, West Triangle, Quezon City
www.dilg.gov.ph
SEP 16 2095 DILG OPINION NO. 122 § df28
USEC. JOSEPH FRANCISCO R. ORTEGA, MBA
Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer
National Youth Commission
3 Fir., West Insula Bldg., #135 West Avenue cor., EDSA
Brgy. Bungod, Quezon City
Dear Undersecretary Ortega:
This has reference to your letter dated February 20, 2025, seeking this Department’s
assistance concerning the queries from the Local Development Officers (LYDOs) in
Region 1 with regard to the implementation of DILG-NYC Joint Memorandum Circular
(JMC) No. 1 s. 2024.1
In particular, hereunder, quoted in foto, are the issues proffered:
1. On the Appointment of an Officer-in-Charge (OIC). Item 4.2 of the JMC on
Filling-up of Vacancies does not explicitly define the grounds for appointing an OIC.
Could the JMC be amended to provide clear and specific criteria? This would help
ensure transparency and fairness in appointments at the grassroots level and
prevent potential misuse by appointing authorities.
2. Use of the Term “OIC”. The term “OIC” typically implies functions. Would it be
more appropriate to use the term “acting” instead, in line with the Omnibus Rules
on Appointments and Other Human Resource Actions?
3. Honoraria for the OIC. Is there a clear mechanism or guideline for granting
honoraria to an OIC? Establishing such a standard would provide LGU budget
officers and COA with a uniform basis for implementation, preventing varying
interpretations.
4. Applicability of the SKSE in Case of Mass Resignation. If all SK officials in a
barangay resign simultaneously, should the JMC or the SKSE provisions take
precedence? Given that the SKSE stipulates procedures for cases where a quorum
is lacking, which set of regulations should be followed in such a situation?
We shall address the foregoing issues in seriatim.
1 “Filling Up of Vacancies in the Sangguniang Kabataan through Succession, Conduct of the Katipunan ng
Kabataan (KK) Assembly or Appointment by the Mayor”
“Matino, Mahusay at Maaasahan”
Trunkline No.: 8876-34-54
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.