Court decisionSource checked
Cruz and Europa v. Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources
G.R. No. 135385 · 2000 · Indigenous peoples and ancestral domains
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
DIGITAL P. 42 / 101
"Section 59. Certification Precondition.-- All departments and other governmental agencies shall
henceforth be strictly enjoined from issuing, renewing or granting any concession, license or lease,
or entering into any production-sharing agreement. without prior certification from the NCIP that
the area affected does not overlap with any ancestral domain. Such certification shall only be issued
after a field-based investigation is conducted by the Ancestral Domains Office of the area
concerned: Provided, That no certification shall be issued by the NCIP without the free and prior
informed and written consent of the ICCs/IPs concerned: Provided, further, That no department,
government agency or government-owned or -controlled corporation may issue new concession,
license, lease, or production sharing agreement while there is a pending application for a CADT:
Provided, finally, That the ICCs/IPs shall have the right to stop or suspend, in accordance with this
Act, any project that has not satisfied the requirement of this consultation process."
Concessions, licenses, lease or production-sharing agreements for the exploitation of natural resources shall not
be issued, renewed or granted by all departments and government agencies without prior certification from the
NCIP that the area subject of the agreement does not overlap with any ancestral domain. The NCIP certification
shall be issued only after a field-based investigation shall have been conducted and the free and prior informed
written consent of the ICCs/IPs obtained. Non-compliance with the consultation requirement gives the ICCs/IPs
the right to stop or suspend any project granted by any department or government agency.
As its subtitle suggests, this provision requires as a precondition for the issuance of any concession, license or
agreement over natural resources, that a certification be issued by the NCIP that the area subject of the
agreement does not lie within any ancestral domain. The provision does not vest the NCIP with power over the
other agencies of the State as to determine whether to grant or deny any concession or license or agreement. It
merely gives the NCIP the authority to ensure that the ICCs/IPs have been informed of the agreement and that
their consent thereto has been obtained. Note that the certification applies to agreements over natural resources
that do not necessarily lie within the ancestral domains. For those that are found within the said domains,
Sections 7(b) and 57 of the IPRA apply.
V. THE IPRA IS A RECOGNITION OF OUR ACTIVE PARTICIPATION IN THE INDIGENOUS
INTERNATIONAL MOVEMENT.
The indigenous movement can be seen as the heir to a history of anti-imperialism stretching back to prehistoric
times. The movement received a massive impetus during the 1960's from two sources. First, the decolonization
of Asia and Africa brought into the limelight the possibility of peoples controlling their own destinies. Second,
the right of self-determination was enshrined in the UN Declaration on Human Rights.[238] The rise of the civil
rights movement and anti-racism brought to the attention of North American Indians, Aborigines in Australia,
and Maori in New Zealand the possibility of fighting for fundamental rights and freedoms.
In 1974 and 1975, international indigenous organizations were founded,[239] and during the 1980's, indigenous
affairs were on the international agenda. The people of the Philippine Cordillera were the first Asians to take
part in the international indigenous movement. It was the Cordillera People's Alliance that carried out successful
campaigns against the building of the Chico River Dam in 1981-82 and they have since become one of the best-
organized indigenous bodies in the world.[240]
Presently, there is a growing concern for indigenous rights in the international scene. This came as a result of
the increased publicity focused on the continuing disrespect for indigenous human rights and the destruction of
the indigenous peoples' environment, together with the national governments' inability to deal with the situation.
[241] Indigenous rights came as a result of both human rights and environmental protection, and have become a
part of today's priorities for the international agenda.[242]
International institutions and bodies have realized the necessity of applying policies, programs and specific rules
concerning IPs in some nations. The World Bank, for example, first adopted a policy on IPs as a result of the
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.