Court decisionSource checked
Cruz and Europa v. Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources
G.R. No. 135385 · 2000 · Indigenous peoples and ancestral domains
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
DIGITAL P. 52 / 101
[153] Id. at 700.
[154] 42 C.J.S., Indians, Sec. 29 [1944 ed.].
[155] There are 3 kinds of Indian reservations: (a) those created by treaties prior to 1871; (b) those created by acts
of Congress since 1871; and (c) those made by Executive Orders where the President has set apart public lands
for the use of the Indians in order to keep them within a certain territory-- 42 C.J.S., Indians, Sec. 29 citing
Sioux Tribe of Indians v. U.S. 94 Ct. Cl. 150, 170, certiorari granted 62 S. Ct. 631, 315 U.S. 790, 86 L. Ed. 1194,
affirmed 62 S. Ct. 1095, 316 U.S. 317, 86 L. Ed. 1501. It is observed that the first two kinds may include
lands possessed by aboriginal title. The last kind covers Indian reservations proper.
Until 1871, Indian tribes were recognized by the United States as possessing the attributes of nations to the
extent that treaties were made with them. In that year, however, Congress, by statute, declared its intention
thereafter to make the Indian tribes amenable directly to the power and authority of the United States by the
immediate exercise of its legislative power over them, instead of by treaty. Since then, Indian affairs have been
regulated by acts if Congress and by contracts with the Indian tribes practically amounting to treaties-- 41 Am
Jur 2d, Indians, Sec. 55 [1995 ed].
[156] 42 C.J.S. Indians, Sec. 28 [1944 ed.].
[157] Ibid.; see also U.S. v. Santa Fe Pac. R. Co., Ariz., 62 S. Ct. 248, 314 U.S. 339, 86 L. Ed. 260 [1941].
[158] Ibid.
[159] 8 Wheat 543, 5 L. Ed. 681 [1823].
[160] Id. at 680.
[161] Id. at 689.
[162] Id. at 696; see also 41 ALR Fed 425, Annotation: Proof and Extinguishment of Aboriginal Title to Indian
Lands, Sec. 2[a] [1979].
[163] Buttz v. Northern Pac.R. Co., Dak., 7 S. Ct. 100, 119 U.S. 55, 30 L. Ed. 330, 335 [1886].
[164] Lynch, Native Title, supra, at 293-294; Cohen, Original Indian Title, 32 Minn. L.R. 48-49 [1947].
[165] 6 Pet 515, 8 L.Ed. 483 [1832].
[166] Id. at 499.
[167] Id. at 500.
[168] Id. at 501.
[169] The title of the government to Indian lands, the naked fee, is a sovereign title, the government having no
landlord from whom it holds the fee-- Shoshone Tribe of Indians of Wind River Reservation in Wyoming v.
U.S., 85 Ct. Cl. 331, certiorari granted U.S. v. Shoshone Tribe of Indians, 58 S. Ct. 609, 303 U.S. 629, 82 L. Ed.
1090, affirmed 58 S. Ct. 794, 304 U.S. 111, 82 L. Ed. 1213, 1218-1219 [1938].
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.