Court decisionSource checked
Cruz and Europa v. Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources
G.R. No. 135385 · 2000 · Indigenous peoples and ancestral domains
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
DIGITAL P. 56 / 101
"Art. 11. Customs which are contrary to law, public order or public policy shall not be countenanced."
"Art. 12. A custom must be proved as a fact, according to the rules of evidence."
[219] Article 78 on marriages between Mohammedans or pagans who live in the non-Christian provinces-- this is
now Art. 33 of the Family Code; Art. 118, now Art. 74 of the Family Code on property relations between
spouses; Art. 577 on the usufructuary of woodland; Art. 657 on easement of right of way for passage of
livestock; Arts. 678, 1315, 1376, 1522, 1564 and 1577. Please see Aquino, Civil Code, vol. 1, p. 25.
[220] Castle Bros. v. Gutierrez Hermanos, 11 Phil. 629 [1908]; In Re: Firm Name of Ozaeta Romulo, 92 SCRA 1
[1979]; Yao Kee v. Sy-Gonzales, 167 SCRA 736 [1988]; Please see Aquino, Civil Code, vol. 1, p. 26 for a list of
other cases.
[221] This situation is analogous to the Muslim code or the Code of Muslim Personal Laws (P.D. 1083) which
took effect on February 4, 1977 despite the effectivity of the Civil Code and the Family Code. P.D. 1083
governs persons, family relations and succession among Muslims, the adjudication and settlement of disputes,
the organization of the Shari'a courts, etc.
[222] Mariflor P. Pagusara, The Kalinga Ili: Cultural-Ecological Reflections on Indigenous Theora and Praxis of
Man-Nature Relationship, Dakami Ya Nan Dagami, p. 36, Papers and Proceedings of the 1st Cordillera Muti-
Sectoral Land Congress, 11-14 March 1983, Cordillera Consultative Committee [1984].
[223] Section 2, Article XII.
[224] A "co-production agreement" is defined as one wherein the government provides input to the mining
operation other than the mineral resource-- Section 26 (b), R.A. 7942, the Philippine Mining Act of 1995.
[225] A "joint venture agreement" is one where a joint-venture company is organized by the government and the
contractor with both parties having equity shares, and the government entitled to a share in the gross output--
Section 26 (c), R.A. 7942.
[226] A mineral "production-sharing agreement" is one where the government grants to the contractor the
exclusive right to conduct mining operations within a contract area and shares in the gross output. The contractor
provides the financing, technology, management and personnel necessary for the implementation of the
agreement-- Section 26 (a), R.A. 7942.
[227] Section 26, R.A. 7942.
[228] Section 3 [d], People's Small-Scale Mining Act of 1991 (R.A. 7076) provides:
"Sec. 3 [d] 'Small-scale mining contract' refers to co-production, joint venture or mineral production sharing
agreement between the State and a small-scale mining contractor for the small-scale utilization of a plot of
mineral land."
[229] Section 3 [b], R.A. 7076.
[230] NCIP Administrative Order No. 1, Series of 1998.
[231] In Republic v. Court of Appeals, 160 SCRA 228, 239 [1988], Cruz, J., ponente, it was declared that if a
person is the owner of a piece of agricultural land on which minerals are discovered, his ownership of such land
does not give him the right to extract or utilize the said minerals without the permission of the State to which
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.