DILG legal opinionSource checked
Request for Legal Opinion Re: Implementation of Barangay Clearing and Restoration Activities on an Alleged Barangay Road Within a Disputed Private Property.
DILG Opinion No. 31, s. 2026 · 2026 · DILG legal opinions — verified official source
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
SCANNED TEXT · CHECK ORIGINAL WORDING · DIGITAL P. 2 / 3
extension, all the personnel of the Office of the Barangay; as well as the
contingent members of the Anda Municipal Police Station, who actively
participated in the assailed acts, civilly, criminally, and/or administratively
liable."
The requesting party likewise prays that this Department issue a directive or resolution
holding in abeyance the implementation of Memorandum No. 74, Series of 2026, and
the Final Notice dated 06 May 2026, and direct the concerned local officials to cease
and desist from further implementation actions pending resolution of the foregoing
issues.
At the outset, it bears emphasizing that this Department is not a trier of facts.
Questions involving ownership, possession, boundaries, classification of property, and
the determination of whether a particular parcel of land constitutes a public road or
forms part of a private property are factual matters that fall within the competence of
the appropriate administrative agencies and courts. Accordingly, this Opinion
proceeds solely on the basis of applicable legal principles and without making any
factual determination on the status of the subject property.
Under the Local Government Code of 1991, local government units are vested with
the authority to maintain public roads and protect public rights-of-way. Corollary
thereto, local officials may undertake lawful measures to remove illegal obstructions
on public properties and public roads in accordance with law.
However, where the area sought to be cleared is subject to a bona fide dispute as to
ownership, possession, or legal classification, local officials must exercise such
authority within the bounds of due process and applicable legal procedures. The
Constitution protects persons from deprivation of property without due process of law.
Consequently, government action resulting in the destruction, removal, or taking of
private property must be supported by lawful authority and undertaken in accordance
with established procedures.
In cases where the character of the property as a public road is disputed, local officials
cannot conclusively determine property rights through mere administrative
declaration. The resolution of ownership disputes and competing claims over real
property generally belongs to the proper courts or agencies vested with jurisdiction
over such matters.
Accordingly, if the existence, location, classification, or public character of the alleged
barangay road remains contested, prudence dictates that the concerned local officials
first secure the necessary factual and legal bases supporting their action before
undertaking coercive enforcement measures that may result in the destruction or
removal of private improvements.
With respect to the request that this Department determine the criminal, civil, or
administrative liability of the Punong Barangay, the Municipal Mayor, barangay
personnel, or police officers involved, the same cannot be the subject of a legal
opinion. Liability is a factual and adjudicative matter that may only be determined by
the appropriate courts, the Office of the Ombudsman, or other competent tribunals
after due proceedings and upon evaluation of evidence.
Likewise, this Department cannot issue an order directing local officials to cease
implementation of the questioned actions or declare the validity or invalidity of the acts
Page 2 of 3
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.