DILG legal opinionSource checked
Request for Legal Opinion Re: Implementation of Barangay Clearing and Restoration Activities on an Alleged Barangay Road Within a Disputed Private Property.
DILG Opinion No. 31, s. 2026 · 2026 · DILG legal opinions — verified official source
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
SCANNED TEXT · CHECK ORIGINAL WORDING · DIGITAL P. 3 / 3
complained of, as such matters involve factual determinations and the exercise of
adjudicatory powers not vested in the DILG. Where a party claims that government
officials have unlawfully entered, taken, damaged, or interfered with private property
rights, the appropriate remedies may be pursued before the proper courts or
competent administrative bodies, as the case may be. These may include the
institution of the appropriate civil action to protect property rights, the filing of a petition
for injunctive relief to prevent or restrain further acts allegedly causing irreparable
injury, or the initiation of administrative or criminal complaints before the proper
authorities where warranted by the facts and evidence. The determination of the
propriety of such remedies, however, lies within the jurisdiction of the appropriate
tribunal and not this Department.
In sum, this Department is of the view that:
1. Local officials possess authority under existing laws to protect public roads and
remove unlawful obstructions thereon, subject to observance of due process
and other applicable legal requirements;
2. Where the status of the property as a public road is disputed, the determination
of ownership, possession, boundaries, and property classification are factual
matters and justiciable issues beyond the authority of this Department to
resolve through a legal opinion;
3. Enforcement actions that may result in the taking, destruction, or removal of
private property should be supported by sufficient legal and factual basis and
undertaken in accordance with due process and applicable laws; and
4. Questions regarding criminal, civil, or administrative liability of public officials
and private persons fall within the jurisdiction of the appropriate adjudicative
bodies and cannot be conclusively determined by this Department through a
legal opinion.
This Opinion is rendered based solely on the facts presented and without prejudice to
any action that may be taken by the proper courts, administrative agencies, or other
competent authorities.
We trust that the foregoing sufficiently clarifies the matter.
Very truly yours,
BY AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY:
.
—
ATTY. ROMEO P. Slaurez
Undersecretary for External, Legal and Legislative Affairs
OUSELLA/RPB/LLLS-LRALLD/kbm
2026-05-26-013
Page 3 of 3
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.