DILG legal opinionSource checked
Request for DILG Intervention Regarding the Issuance of Permits to Import Theatrical Pyrotechnic Effects
DILG Opinion No. 23, s. 2026 · 2026 · DILG legal opinions — verified official source
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
SCANNED TEXT · CHECK ORIGINAL WORDING · DIGITAL P. 3 / 3
3. Those presumptively valid acts, €.g., enacted ordinances, consummated
acts that already enjoy the presumption of regularity on the part of the
public officer concerned, and similar instances;
4. Those that are litis pendencia or pending litigation, except when the court
itself requests for the opinion. In the event that an opinion has been
rendered by the Department and its field officers without knowledge or
information that a case involving the issues raised in the query is pending
in court, such opinion shall automatically be deemed ineffective: and
5. Those that are cognizable by other agencies of the government.”
(Emphasis supplied)
This opinion is being rendered without prejudice to any contrary opinion of competent
authorities and the courts.
We hope to have guided you on the matter.
Very truly yours,
BY AUTHORITY.OF THE SECRETARY:
ATTY. i
Undersecretary for External, Legal and Legislative Affairs
OUSELLA/RPB/LLLS-LRALLD/jam
Page 3 of 3
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.