An independent Philippine legal research libraryRead with context. Verify with confidence.
← Back to library
DILG legal opinionSource checked

Request for DILG Intervention Regarding the Issuance of Permits to Import Theatrical Pyrotechnic Effects

DILG Opinion No. 23, s. 2026 · 2026 · DILG legal opinions — verified official source

Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.

SCANNED TEXT · CHECK ORIGINAL WORDING · DIGITAL P. 3 / 3
3. Those presumptively valid acts, €.g., enacted ordinances, consummated acts that already enjoy the presumption of regularity on the part of the public officer concerned, and similar instances; 4. Those that are litis pendencia or pending litigation, except when the court itself requests for the opinion. In the event that an opinion has been rendered by the Department and its field officers without knowledge or information that a case involving the issues raised in the query is pending in court, such opinion shall automatically be deemed ineffective: and 5. Those that are cognizable by other agencies of the government.” (Emphasis supplied) This opinion is being rendered without prejudice to any contrary opinion of competent authorities and the courts. We hope to have guided you on the matter. Very truly yours, BY AUTHORITY.OF THE SECRETARY: ATTY. i Undersecretary for External, Legal and Legislative Affairs OUSELLA/RPB/LLLS-LRALLD/jam Page 3 of 3