DILG legal opinionSource checked
Salary Pending PS — DILG Region I opinion letter
DILG Region I letter dated 2011-06-10 — Salary Pending PS · 2011 · DILG regional legal opinions — verified official source
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
CHECK ORIGINAL WORDING · DIGITAL P. 1 / 2
REPUBLIG OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Regional Office No. l, San Fernando City, La Union
Tel. Nos. (072) 888-21-08; 700-57-46 888'22-89;7O0-27-01;7O0-36-79;607'12-4s
Fax Nos. 888-22-94: 7 00-27 -03
June 10,2011
CLEMSY B. SAGUTO-.BENINSIG
Executive Assistant V
Municipality of Sudipen
2520 La Union
Dear Ms. Beninsig
w,,
This refers to your letter seeking the Department's clarification on the entitlement of
backwages of Hon. Mayor Alexander O. Buquing during the period of his preventive suspension.
Before dwelling on the issue, may we first invite your attention to the provision of the
Locat Government Code of 1991, to wiU
Sec. 64. Salary of Respondent Pending Suspension. -
The respondent official preventively suspended from office shall
receive no salary or compensation during such suspension; Dut
upon sub*quent etonerqtion and reinstotement, he SHALL BE
PAID ful, filary or cornpniltion including such emotuments
accru i ng d u ring suclt su sp nsion.
In BRUGADA vs. THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION. CIJITURE AND SPORTS. 6.R. No.
142332-43. Januarv 31. 2fl15. The Court categorically declared that the payment of back wages
during the period of suspension of a civil servant who is subsequently reinstated is proper if he
is found innocefi of the ciiharaes and the susoension is uniustrTied.
'The Joint Resolution of the Office of the Deputy Ombudsman for Luzon in OMB-L-C-06-
0992-1, entitled Melvin Macusi, et. al vs. Alexander Q. Buquing, dismissed the case against
respondent Buquing because based from records, there exist no probable cause for the charge
of violation of R.A. 3019. And with regard to the charge of dereliction of duty, misconduct in
office and gross negligenci, the Ombudsman held that there exists substantial evidence against
the respondent for Simple Misconduct in office. However, the imposition of the administrative
penalty on the respondent can no longer be enforced because, in view of his re-election as
Municipal Mayor in the last local election conducted on May 14, 2OO7, it became moot and
academic by reason of the Aguinaldo Doctrine."
Celebrating 20 Years of Local Autonomy i'n the Philippines
s._._r
:ltx
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.