DILG legal opinionSource checked
Appointment Brgy Treasurer — DILG Region I opinion letter
DILG Region I letter dated 2011-10-21 — Appointment Brgy Treasurer · 2011 · DILG regional legal opinions — verified official source
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
CHECK ORIGINAL WORDING · DIGITAL P. 2 / 2
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Regional Office No. l, San Fernando City, La Union
Tel. Nos. (072) 883-21-08;7A0-57-46;888-22-89;700-27-01;700'36-79;
607 -12-45
Fax Nos. 888-22-94: 7 OA-27 -43
validity of your appointment since, upon being informed, you immediately relinquished such
position. Also, the absence of proper turn-over involving the past barangay treasurer will not
affect the validity of your appointment since you qualified and appointed to such position.
This Office would like to note that there are no valid grounds that would disqualify
you from beingthe appointed BarangayTreasurer ofyour Barangay'
Now, on the matter of appointing Arnold Bello as a Temporary Barangay Treasurer
of your Barangay. This Office opines that the act of the Punong Barangay and the
Sangguniang Barangay Members in appointing a temporary barangay treasurer is invalid'
illegal and contrary to law. Under the law, an appointment to any position can only be made
when there is a PERMANENT VACANCY or TEMPORARY VACANCY to any government
position.
The position of Barangay Treasurer of Barangay Francia west is not vacant because
you have legal title to such position being the appointed Barangay Treasurer' which is valid
and in compliance with the requirements of the Local Government code of the Philippines'
The Barangay Officials of your Barangay did not revoke your appointment as a Barangay
Treasurer. Hence, there is no vacancy to such position that would justify the appointment of
Mr. Arnold Bello in a temporary capacity'
As to the validity and legality of the Internal Agreement made by the Punong
Barangay and sangguniang Barangay Members. This office opines that it is a blatant
violation of the Equal Protection clause as provided by Article lll of the Philippine
constitution. The lnternal Agreement signed by the Barangay officials concerned will
tolerate discrimination in the Local Government'
However, since the Internal Agreement is not embodied in a resolution or an
ordinance, the same has no legal effect. The internal agreement cannot be the basis of any
action by the Barangay Officials. lt cannot be the rule to be followed by the Barangay
officials. so, any concerned citizen may question such internal agreement' And if the
Barangay officials will still follow such internal agreement, they can be subjected to
administrative disciplinary action'
Wehopetohaveenlightenedyouontheissueathand'ouropinion,however,is
without preiudice to any *ting or opinion rendered by a higher authority or a
competent tribunal'
Very trulY Yours,
. BIASON, CESO lll
Relional Director j
I
legaUIx
celebratirug 20 Years of Local Autonomy in t.he Philippines
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.