DILG legal opinionSource checked
Appointment of Brgy Treasurer — DILG Region I opinion letter
DILG Region I letter dated 2014-02-10 — Appointment of Brgy Treasurer · 2014 · DILG regional legal opinions — verified official source
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
CHECK ORIGINAL WORDING · DIGITAL P. 1 / 2
$\ ,"|t
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AITD LOCAL GOVERITMENT
Regional Office I, City of San FeInando, La Union
Telephone Number (O72) 888 2108 . 7O0 5746 . 888 2289 . 7OO 27Ol . 7OO 3979 . 607 1245
www.dilgregion l.com
February 10,2014
THE HONORABLE MEMBERS
Sangguniang Barangay
Barangay Quirino, Santa
Ilocos Sur
f u'r't
Dear SB Members:
This pertains to your letter request seeking clarification regarding the appointment
made by your Punong Barangay for the position of barangay treasurer.
On the first issue, the Sangguniang Barangay members are liable for not
approving/concurring the reappointment of the barangay treasurer. The law provides that:
Section 395 of the Local Government Code of 1991, Barangay Treasurer:
Appointment, Qualifrcatioa, Powers and Duties. -
(a) The barangpy treasurer shall be appointed by th" Punong Barangay with
rhe concurrence of the majority of all the sangguniang barangay members.
The appointment of the barangay trealiurer shall not be zubject to attestation
by the Civil Service Commission.
(b) The barangay treasurer shall be of legal age, a qualified voter, and an
actual resident ofthe barangay concerned.
(c) No person shall be appointed barangay treasurer if he is a sangguniang
.
barangay member, a govenrment employee, or a relative of the Punong
Barangay within the fourth civil degree of consanguinity or affinity.
tffi
Upon the presentation of Punong Barangay Advincula regarding the reappointment
of the incumbent treasurer, the Sangguniang Barangay (SB) unreasonably failed to give
concurrence to such reappointment. It is unreasonable and without basis since the
reservarion and oppositions of the SB were not based on the qualifications (Section 395, b
and disqualifications (Section 395 c).
The enumerated oppositions of the SB per submitted Manifesto were not valid
grounds not to give their concurrence. In fact, Punong Barangay Advincula answered every
allegations made by the SB in not giving their concurrence thereto. And Punong Barangay
Advincula is correct in saying that issues relating to trust and confidence in the performance
of work can be answered in a proper forum which your incumbent ueasurer shall be given
the opponunity to defend herself.
Ebnse ftnh the
Philipines
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.