DILG legal opinionSource checked
Whether of not the Veto message of the Municipal Mayor is consistent in its entirety or of is ambiguous with regard to the scopre of its application ie.e. the entirety of the ordinance or only to spec
DILG Opinion No. 120, s. 2025 · 2025 · DILG legal opinions — verified official source
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
SCANNED TEXT · CHECK ORIGINAL WORDING · DIGITAL P. 1 / 3
—_ BAGONG PILIPINAS
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
DILG-NAPOLCOM Center, EDSA cor. Quezon Avenue, West Triangle, Quezon City
www.dilg.gov.ph
DILG OPINION NO. 120 §. snab
SEP 16 2025
HON. FERNANDO B. ERIO
Vice Mayor
Office of the Sangguniang Bayan
Municipality of Trinidad, Bohol
THRU: WARLITA A. OREVILLO-ORIOQUE
Secretary to the Sanggunian
Dear Vice Mayor Erio:
This has reference to the indorsement letter dated January 31, 2025, from Atty. Rowena
Turingan-Sanchez, Director IV, Legal Office, Office of the President, relative to
Sangguniang Bayan (SB) Resolution No. 001, s. 2025, seeking legal opinions, legal
remedies, and legal actions concerning the veto message of the Municipal Mayor of
Trinidad, Bohol, against Municipal Appropriation Ordinance No. 2024-04.
Culled from the subject SB Resolution and its attachments are the following pertinent
factual antecedents:
e On December 16, 2024, the SB passed, through mass motion, Resolution No. 336,
s. 2024, titled: “A Resolution Adopting and Approving the Supplemental Investment
Plan (SIP) for the Proposed Supplemental Budget No. 3, CY 2024 for the Purpose
of Granting the Collective Negotiation Agreement (CNA) Agreement, Service
Recognition Incentive (SRI) for all Qualified Personnel, Elected Officials and
Appointed Employees and For Granting the Gratuity Pay for Contract of Service
(COS) and Job Order (JO) Workers with Estimated Total Amount of Ten Million
Seven Hundred Forty Four Thousand (P10,744,000.00) Pesos Only to be Taken
From the Savings of Allowable Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses
(MOOE) and Savings from Personal Services of the Current Annual Budget CY
2024 as Recommended by the Municipal Development Council Per its Resolution
No. 07, Series of 2024.”
e On December 17, 2024, the aforesaid Resolution, together with Appropriation
Ordinance No. 2024-04, was submitted to and acknowledged receipt by the Office
of the Municipal Mayor.
e On December 19, 2024, the Municipal Mayor in return, sent a Veto Message
against Appropriation Ordinance No. 2024-04. Apparently, the said Veto Message
has caused confusion among the SB members. The SB members observed that in
the 18! paragraph thereof, the Municipal Mayor vetoed the said Ordinance in its
“Matino, Mahusay at Maaasahan”
Trunkline No. (02) 8876 3454
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.