Court decisionSource checked
271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 Separate Concurring Opinion: Justice Japar B. Dimaampao — Official PDF
271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 — Promulgated October 7, 2026 · 2026 · Supreme Court 2026 / Separate opinion
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
DIGITAL P. 12 / 26
Separate Concurring Opinion 12 G.R. Nos. 271059,
. _271347, E-02472, and E~04036
revenue collections, issuance of a certification that remitted collections to the
BTr from a particular revenue source has exceeded the corresponding revenue
collections target; or (ii) for new revenue collections, issuance of a
certification thatremitted collections identified were not part of, nor included
in, the original revenue collection targets reflected.
In the case of approved loans for foreign-assisted projects, the loan proceeds
shall be promptly released to the agency concerned, through the issuance of
corresponding SARO upon submission of a Special Budget Request,
supported by a copy of the perfected loan agreement, as approved in
accordance with pertinent laws, rules, regulations, and guidelines issued
thereon.
After presidential veto, the remaining purposes enumerated under the
unprogrammed appropriations of the 2026 GAA are the following: (1)
Support to Foreign-Assisted Projects; (2) Program on Risk Management; and
, (3) Revised AFP Modernization Pl'ogram.34 , • •,
The ponencia declared unconstitutional the first and second triggers
under Special Provision 1 of subsection XLIII, i.e., excess or new revenue
collections in any one of the identified non-tax revenue sources from their
respective corresponding revenue collection target, as reflected in the budget
of expenditure and sources of financing (BESF), for being violative of Article
VII, Section 22.35 After all, this is a "repudiation of the Court's interpretation
in [Araullo v. Aquino],36" which maintained that it should be the aggregate
revenue collection that must first e):Cceed the aggregate revenue target as a
pre-requisite to ,the use of unprogrammed funds.37 In addition, the ponencia
discerned that these constitute as an undue delegation of legislative power
given that it is "too broad, lacks adequate guidelines or limitations to map out
the boundaries of the President's authority."38
I concur.
In Gerochi v. Department of Energy,39 the Court explained that the
principle of non-delegation of powers is corollary to the foundational
principle of separation of powers, given that it is the duty of each of the
departments of government to carry out the power that has been allocated by
the Constitution. The relevant discussion reads:
The principle of separation of powers ordains that each of the three branches
of government has exclusive cognizance of and is supreme in matters falling
34 See Republic Act No. 12314 (2026), sec. l, XLIII.
35 SECTION 22. The President shall submit to the Congress within thirty days from the opening of every
regular session, as the basis of the genernl appropriation_s bill, a budget of expenditures and sources of
financing, including receipts from existing and proposed revenue measures.
36 737 Phil. 457 (2014) [Per J. Bersamin, En Banc]. •
37 Ponencia, pp. 53-55.
38 Id. at 67.
39 554 Phil. 563 (2007) [Per J. Nachura, En Banc].
f
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.