Court decisionSource checked
271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 Concurring and Dissenting Opinion: Justice Jhosep Y. Lopez — Official PDF
271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 — Promulgated October 7, 2026 · 2026 · Supreme Court 2026 / Separate opinion
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
DIGITAL P. 12 / 36
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion 1.2 G.R. Nos. 271059, 271347,
E-02472 & E-04036
... [W]hile the judicial department and this Court are not
bound by the acceptance of the President's certification by both
the House of Representatives and the Senate, prudent exercise
of our powers and respect due our co .. equal branches of
government in matters committed to them by the Constitution,
caution a stay of the judicial hand.
Therefore, the Presidents exercise of the power to issue such
certification is one that should be accorded with due deference. As such, the
Court must refrain.from intruding into such matter through the exercise of
its judicial power in the absence of grave abuse of discretion, considering
that the passage of laws is essentially an affair that falls within the purview
of the political branches of government.56 (Citations omitted, emphasis
supplied) • • • • • • • •• • • • •• •
In the present case, President Marcos certified as urgent the enactment
of House Bill No: 8980 based on the ~ollowing reasons:
In order to address the need to maintain continuous government
operations following the end of the current fiscal year (FY), to expedite the
funding of various programs, projects, and activities for FY 2024, and to
ensure budgetary preparedness that v.ill enable the govermnent to
effectively perform its Constitutional mandate.
Following the pron0uncements of this Court in Tolentino, Calleja, and
Ahas Kida, this Court finds that there exists a necessity for the immediate
enactment ofHouse Bill No. 8980 into law. The need to assure continuity in
government operations can be considered a sufficient basis for urgency.
The timely enactment of the national budget is critical in ensuring that
government •operations will be funded. Without an approved budget,
government agencies may face delays in fhnding, which can stall essential
services and programs. This affects everything from health and education to
public safety-and infi:a~tructure projects. Further; a timely budget also allows
the government to implement its fiscal policies effectively. It helps in planning.
and executing infrastructure projects, social programs, and other programs
and projects. Furthermore, delays in passing the budget can signal political
instability or inefficiency, potentially detelTing both domestic and foreign
investment.
Article VI, Section 25( l) of the Constitution provides that "if, by the
end of any fiscal year, the Congress shall have failed to pass the general
approp1iations hi!ffor the-ensuing fiscal year, the general appropriations law
for the preceding fiscal year shall be deemed re-enacted and shall remain in
fore~ and effect· until the general. appropriations bill . is passed by the
Congress."
56 Atty. Calleja v. Executiv? S1;.:cretary lvi'edialdea; 91 ~-B Phil. L 269-270 (2021) [Per J. Carandang, En
Bancj.
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.