Court decisionSource checked
271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 Concurring and Dissenting Opinion: Justice Jhosep Y. Lopez — Official PDF
271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 — Promulgated October 7, 2026 · 2026 · Supreme Court 2026 / Separate opinion
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
DIGITAL P. 36 / 36
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion 36 G.R. Nos. 271059, 271347,
E-02472& E-04036
Second, the utilization of unprogrammed appropnat10ns must be
triggered strictly by excess revenue over the total revenue targets as identified
in the BESF, pursuant to this Court's ruling in Araullo.
Third, release of funds under unprogrammed appropriations must be
transparent and open to scrutiny, Initiation of P APs under unprogrammed
appropriations is presently within the jurisdiction of DBM, which receives
formal requests from implementing agencies for the funding of proposed
projects The DBM evaluate.s the requests of implementing agencies and
authorizes the release of funds once there is a determination of the existence
of excess funds or approved loan agreements as certified by the Bureau of
Treasury. Considering that the DBM is given wide discretion as to the release
and utilization of unprogramrned appropriations, there must be a mechanism
to monitor the projects funded by unprogrammed appropriations real-time.
This shall be different from the requirement of periodic report submitted to
Congress as part of its congressional oversight over the national budget.
Notably, under the 2024 GAA, the DBM is required to post on its website the
status of monthly releases charged against unprograrnmed appropriations. In
the interest of transparency and accountability, this requirement should be
strictly complied with and should envision a full disclosure of information
relevant to the funded project, including proper documentation and
justification, as well as certifications from the Bureau of Treasury, as to the
availability of excess funds.
Accordingly, Congress must be given sufficient leeway to address
contingencies and projects contributory to the country's development that it
foresees. and which must be allotted a budget, subject to the occurrence of
specified conditions. As such, unprograrnmed appropriations must be seen as
servmg a useful purpose that complements the budget prepared by the
President.
JHOS~OPEZ
Associate Justice
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY
~
MARIA CECILIA M. CAPUNPON
Deputy Clerk of Court
OCC-En Banc, Supreme Court
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.