Court decisionSource checked
271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 Concurring and Dissenting Opinion: Justice Maria Filomena D. Singh — Official PDF
271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 — Promulgated October 7, 2026 · 2026 · Supreme Court 2026 / Separate opinion
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
DIGITAL P. 12 / 37
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion 12 G.R. Nos. 271347, 278353,
E-02472 & E-04036
opportunity to review it and prepare a Veto Message, where budget items are
subjected to line-item veto, or are identified for conditional implementation.22
The next phase is budget execution. Here, the DBM is vested with the
primary authority on how the GAA is to be implemented. During this phase,
the DBM performs the following procedures: (a) issue the programs and
guidelines for the release. of funds; (b) prepare an Allotment and Cash Release
Program; (c) release allotments; and (d) issue disbursement authorities. The
issuance by the DBM of the Agency Budget Matrix or the Special Allotment
Release Order authorizes agencies to incur obligations on behalf of the
Govenunent in order to implement their PAPs. 23
Finally, budget accountability pertains to the monit01ing of )low funds
have been effectively and efficiently utilized to achieve the State's socio-
, ecoi:omic goals by alklwing the DBM to asses.s tµe performance of agencies
during the fiscal year for the purpose of implementing reforms and
establishing new policies.24 It includes the power of the Conunission on Audit
to examine the accounts of each government agency and instrumentality, to
ascertain whether public funds were in fact utilized for the purpose for which
they had been intended, and to prevent and disallow irregular, unnecessary,
excessive, extravagant, or unconscionable expenditures of government
funds.25
This leads us to the question of where the UAs fit in the budget cycle
considering their unique nature and conditional implementation.
Historical background and rationale
of unprogrammed appropriations
UAs are a peculiar feature of the Philippine public budget. Defined as
' a "standby" legislative authority to incur additional spending obligations,26
their disbursement is conditioned upon the occurrence of certain fiscal
conditions specified in the GAA. Unlike programmed appropriations, UAs
pertain to P APs which are unsupported by current financing and revenue
sources. Since they do not have guaranteed funding, UAs are not a standby
fund.
UAs are supposed to provide flexibility in budget execution. In the
early years from their conception in 1987, U As primarily served as contingent
22 Id. at 547-549.
" Id. at 550-552.
24 Id. at 552.
25 Chozas v. Commission on Audit, 864 Phil. 733, 752 (2019) [Per J. A. Reyes, Jr., En Banc]. .
26 Department of Budget and Management, Glossary of Terms, available at https;//www.dbm.gov.ph/V1<'P"'
content/uploads/BESF/BESF2026/GLOSSARY.pdf
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.