Court decisionSource checked
271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 Concurring and Dissenting Opinion: Justice Maria Filomena D. Singh — Official PDF
271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 — Promulgated October 7, 2026 · 2026 · Supreme Court 2026 / Separate opinion
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
DIGITAL P. 3 / 37
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion 3 G.R. Nos. 271347, 278353,
Ea02472 & E-04036
national budgeting under the
Constitution
It is a settled principle that the "power of the purse" belongs to
Congress. Article VI, Section 29(1) of the Constitution provides that "[n]o
money shall be paid out of the Treasury except in pursuance of an
appropriation made by law." Thus, legislative authorization is always
required prior to the disbursement of public funds.
The Court has repeatedly recognized the appropriation power as one
that is exclusively lodged in Congress. In Ang Nars Party-List v. Executive
1 Secretary, the Court declared that "[t]he power of the purse belongs
exclusively to Congress" such that "[t]he power to appropriate public funds
, can,only be made through a law, and the power to enact a law is a purely
legislative power."2
However, the sole propos1t10n that Congress is granted the
appropnat1ons power does not answer the question of how broadly and
expansively may such power be exercised under the parameters provided for
by the Constitution.
The American Constitution, from which our constitutional tradition and
practices concerning the budget process is derived, provides for the same grant
of appropriations power .to the U.S. Congress under both the appropriations
clause3 and the spending clause4 of the U.S. Constitution. As described by the
U.S. Supreme Court, "the power to appropriate is as broad as the power to
tax."5 The only limitation to this power is found in the U.S. Constitution itself,
such as when an appropriations made by the U.S. Congress amounts to a bill
of attainder. 6
Noticeably, the appropriations power of the Philippine Congress is not
as broad as the appropriations and spending power granted to the U.S.
Congress. This is because the Philippine Constitution has provided for other
limitations on how appropriations laws are enacted, which are absent in the
U.S. Constitution.
864 Phil. 607 (2019) [Per J. Carpio, En Banc].
2 Id. at 675.
3 U.S. CONST., art. I, sec. 9, cl. 7 states:
No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law.
4 U.S. CONST., art. I, sec. 8, cl. I states:
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts[,] and Excises, to pay the
Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States.
5 United States v. Butler, 297 U.S. I, 65 (1936) [Per J. Roberts].
6 See United States v. Lovett, 328 U.S. 303 (1946) [Per J. Black].
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.