Court decisionSource checked
271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 Concurring and Dissenting Opinion: Justice Maria Filomena D. Singh — Official PDF
271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 — Promulgated October 7, 2026 · 2026 · Supreme Court 2026 / Separate opinion
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
DIGITAL P. 9 / 37
Concuning and Dissenting Opinion 9 G.R. Nos. 271347, 278353,
E-02472 & E-04036
THE PRESIDENT: Is there any objection to this proposed
amendment of Commissioner Natividad which has been accepted by the
Committee? (Silence) The Chair hears none; the amendment is approved. 17
The most elucidating point in the deliberations caine after the approval
of the amendment proposed by Commissioner Natividad. Commissioner
Francisco "Soc" Rodrigo (Commissioner Rodrigo) raised the issue of
whether Congress can •increase the appropriations for the constitutional
commissions. Commissioner Davide answered, under the wording of the
budget ceiling, that such cannot be done because what the President proposes
to Congress in the Budget is the appropriations necessary "for the operation
of the government" as a whole, which includes all component departments,
agencies and instrumentalities. The deliberations show the following:
MR. RODRIGO: I support fiscal autonomy for the courts and for
the constitutional bodies so I voted in. favor. of fiscal autonomy, But my
understanding of fiscal autonomy is fuat there is an automatic release of the
funds but not insofar as the appropriation of the funds is concerned. I would
like to ask the sponsor a question. It is true that the President recommends
the line-item budget, but is it possible for the legislature to increase the
appropriation for, let us say, the Commission on Elections or the
Commission on Audit?
MR. DAVIDE: Under the Natividad amendment, any
appropriation embodied in the budget for the general operation of the
government may not be increased by the Congress, which is a restriction
also embodied in the 1935 Constitution.
MR. RODRIGO: Is this only for the executive department?
MR. DAVIDE: No, for the operation of the government.
MR. RODRIGO: So the items are recommended by the President
for the operation of the government.
MR. DA VlD.E: Yes. for tlie operation of the government. This
would refer, therefore, to the current operating expenditures of the
government, if I am correct.
MR. RODRIGO: It might not be increased.
MR. DAVIDE: It cannot be increased.
MR. RODRIGO: Can the items be changed without increasing
the amount? Let us say, one item is divided into two or three or two items
are merged by the Congress.
17 .II RECORD, CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSION (July 23, l 986).
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.