Court decisionSource checked
271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 Representative Edcel C. Lagman, substituted by Albay First District Representative Krisel B. Lagman, et al. Vs. The Congress of the Philippines, et al./Aquilino “Koko” Pimentel III and Pantaleo “Bebot” Alvarez Vs. Lucas P. Bersamin, in his capacity as executive secretary, and Amenah F. Pangandaman, in her capacity as secretary of the Department of Budget and Management/Filipinos for Peace, Justice and Progress Movement, Inc. (FPJPM), represented by its president and chairperson, Joseph F. Cadsawan, and Gloria T. Puzon, chapter Officer Vs. The House of Representatives, et al./Edgar R. Erice and Leila De Lima Vs. The Senate of the Philippines, et al. — Official PDF
271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 — Promulgated October 7, 2026 · 2026 · Supreme Court 2026 / Decision or signed resolution
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
DIGITAL P. 32 / 121
Decision 32 G.R. Nos. 271059, 271347, E-02472 and
E-04036
Conference Committee report. In his Concurring Opinion, Justice
Dimaampao keenly observes that "the evaluation of whether the President's
.certification is justified falls within the proviBce of Congress, as the branch
which must naturally respond to the certification."168
The presidential certification of urgency is not a command for Congress
to vote immediately. By allowing voting without the required period for -
regular bills, it only provides Congress with a signal of the urgency of the
passage of the law.
Ill
To resolve the other substantive issues would require an understanding
of the complex process of government budgeting.
Budgeting, in simple tenns, is the process of allocating scarce resources·
among competing public demands and wants to attain societal goals and
objectives. It involves rhaking choices about ends and the means to reach
those ends.
The 1987 Constitution declares the State policy to promote economic
development, giving the highest priority to social justice and human rights.
Article II
Declaration of Principles and State Policies
SECTION 9. The State shall promote a just and dynamic social
order that will ensure the prosperity and independence of the nation and free
the people from poverty through policies that provide adequate social
services, promote full employment, a rising standard of living, and an
improved quality of life for all.
SECTION I 0. The State shall promote social justice in all phases of
national development.
SECTION 17. The State shall give priority to education, science and
technology, arts, culture, and sports to foster patriotism and nationalism,
accelerate social progress, and promote total human liberation and
development.
Article XIII
Social Justice and Human Rights
SECTION I. The Congress shall give; highest priority to the
enactment of measures that protect and e;nhance the right of all the people
to human dignity, reduce social, economic, and political inequalities, and
remove cultural inequities by equitably diffusing wealth and political
power for the common good.
168 J. Dimaampao, ConcmTing Opinion, p. 2.
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.