Court decisionSource checked
271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 Representative Edcel C. Lagman, substituted by Albay First District Representative Krisel B. Lagman, et al. Vs. The Congress of the Philippines, et al./Aquilino “Koko” Pimentel III and Pantaleo “Bebot” Alvarez Vs. Lucas P. Bersamin, in his capacity as executive secretary, and Amenah F. Pangandaman, in her capacity as secretary of the Department of Budget and Management/Filipinos for Peace, Justice and Progress Movement, Inc. (FPJPM), represented by its president and chairperson, Joseph F. Cadsawan, and Gloria T. Puzon, chapter Officer Vs. The House of Representatives, et al./Edgar R. Erice and Leila De Lima Vs. The Senate of the Philippines, et al. — Official PDF
271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 — Promulgated October 7, 2026 · 2026 · Supreme Court 2026 / Decision or signed resolution
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
DIGITAL P. 44 / 121
Decision 44 G.R. Nos. 271059, 271347, E-02472 and . --·~
• E-04036 •
Debt-servicing-both interest and principal amortization payments-
comes first ahead of national priorities, thus considerably narrowing fiscal
space for the government's important projects and priorities such as public
health and education. The table below shows that debt service occupied45%
•of revenues in 2024 and 2025, and· is about· on.e-third of government
expenditures:
Total Debt Service· Interest+ Principal
.. PHP billion 2023 2024 2025 rnrelim) '. •. •i: ,,
Interest ( actual) PHP 628.3B PHP 763.3B PHP 864.IB
Principal - PHP 822.5B PHP 1,018B PHP 1,015.4B
Domestic217
Principal - PHP 121.IB PHP 239.3B PHP 223.7B
Foreiim218
Total Debt Service PHP 1,571.9B PHP 2,020.6B PHP 2,103.lB •
Total Revenues PI-IP 3,824.IB219 PI-IP 4 419B220 PI-IP 4,453.4B ' Total Expenditures PI-IP 5 336 2B221 PHP 5,925.4B222 PI-IP 6,030.3B • '
Total OS/Revenues 41.1% 45.7% 47.2%
Total 29.5% 34.1% 34.9%
DS/Exoenditures
Therefore, Article VII, Section 22, read ,together with Article VI,
Sections 25(1) and 29(1), are constitutional safeguards designed to ensure
not only institutional accountability, but more importantly, fiscal
disdpline. Spending must be controlled vis-a-vis revenues in light of its
impact on debt level and interest payments, and on the countries' development
objectives:
Fiscal discipline requires that governments maintain fiscal positions
that are consistent with macroeconomic stability and sustained economic
growth. To this end, it waffants avoiding excessive borrowing and debt
accumulation. At the same time, policy needs to be judicions in pursuing
resource allocation and distributional objectives, and in smoothing output
fluctuations. Moreover, it is prudent to create budgetary cushions to allow
for the possibility of a response to both adverse shocks and to deal with
predictable fiscal pressures, such as those arising from population aging.
Maintaining fiscal discipline is essential to maintaining
macroeconomic stability, reducing vulnerabilities, and improving aggregate
economic performance. This is especially important if countries are to
successfully meet the challenges, and reap the benefits, of economic and
financial globalization. Fiscal discipline is essential if countries are to avail
themselves of the opportunities offered by increasingly free trade and open
capital markets, to enhance their longer-term economic prospects (see
Hemming, Kell, and Mahfouz, 2002). But it is also necessary to reduce
217 Id.
21s Id
2'° 2025 BESF, Table A.2.
no 2026 BESF, Table A.2.
221 2025 BESF, Table A.2.
222 2026 BESF, Table A.2.
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.