An independent Philippine legal research libraryRead with context. Verify with confidence.
Court decisionSource checked

271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 Representative Edcel C. Lagman, substituted by Albay First District Representative Krisel B. Lagman, et al. Vs. The Congress of the Philippines, et al./Aquilino “Koko” Pimentel III and Pantaleo “Bebot” Alvarez Vs. Lucas P. Bersamin, in his capacity as executive secretary, and Amenah F. Pangandaman, in her capacity as secretary of the Department of Budget and Management/Filipinos for Peace, Justice and Progress Movement, Inc. (FPJPM), represented by its president and chairperson, Joseph F. Cadsawan, and Gloria T. Puzon, chapter Officer Vs. The House of Representatives, et al./Edgar R. Erice and Leila De Lima Vs. The Senate of the Philippines, et al. — Official PDF

271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 — Promulgated October 7, 2026 · 2026 · Supreme Court 2026 / Decision or signed resolution

Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.

DIGITAL P. 70 / 121
Decision 70 G.R. Nos. 271059, 271347, E-02472 and E-04036 expenditure for certain specific purposes, aids and donations for carrying out certain activities, or deposits made to cover to cost of special services to , be rendered to priv<'!te parties. Unless otherwise expressly provided by law, • when any Board, head of department, chief of bureau or office, or any other ofiicial, is authorized to appropriate, allot, distribute or spend any lump-sum appropriation or special, bond, trust, and other funds, such authority shall be subject to the provisions of this section. Second, considering the contingent nature of unprogrammed appropriations and given the country's deficit situation, additional revenues. when they arise are rarely sufficient to fund all purposes under the • Unprogrammed Appropriations. Without sufficient standards, Special Provisions (I )(a) and (b) also give the president the discretion to choose which among the purposes under Unprogrammed Appropriations will be funded, which will not, and what amounts will be spent. Concomitantly, it gives the . president the power to release or withhold funds. These are allocative judgments which occur during budget execution; hence, unconstitutional. The 2026 GAA lists down the expenditures/purposes under the Unprbgrammed Appropriations as follows: • Personnel Maintenance Capital Outlays Total Services and Other Operating Expenses PURPOSE(S) ! .Budgetary Support 6,895,000,000 6,895,000,000 to Government Owned and/or Controlled Corporations 2. Suppmi to Foreign- 34,238,418,000 63,067,253,000 97,305,671,000 Assisted Projects 3. Government of the 5,530,700,000 30,238,781,000 35,769,481,000 Philippines Coun\erpart of . . . Foreign Assisted Projects 4. Program on Risk 3,600,000,000 3,600,000,000 Management 5. Prior Years' LGU 14,623,000 14,623,000 • Shares 6. Revised AFP 50,000,000,000 50,000,000,000 Modernization Program 7. Fiscal Support 4,320,765,000 4,320,765,000 Anearages for Comprehensive Automotive