Court decisionSource checked
271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 Representative Edcel C. Lagman, substituted by Albay First District Representative Krisel B. Lagman, et al. Vs. The Congress of the Philippines, et al./Aquilino “Koko” Pimentel III and Pantaleo “Bebot” Alvarez Vs. Lucas P. Bersamin, in his capacity as executive secretary, and Amenah F. Pangandaman, in her capacity as secretary of the Department of Budget and Management/Filipinos for Peace, Justice and Progress Movement, Inc. (FPJPM), represented by its president and chairperson, Joseph F. Cadsawan, and Gloria T. Puzon, chapter Officer Vs. The House of Representatives, et al./Edgar R. Erice and Leila De Lima Vs. The Senate of the Philippines, et al. — Official PDF
271059/271347/E-02472/E-04036 — Promulgated October 7, 2026 · 2026 · Supreme Court 2026 / Decision or signed resolution
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
DIGITAL P. 86 / 121
Decision 86 G.R. Nos. 271059, 271347, E-02472 ~d
• Es04036.I
Ayuda sa Kapos and I
Kita Program
i
! (AKAP) i
Protective services
for individuals and 19,971,570,000 34,276,771,000 14,305,201,000:
families in difficult .00 .00 00
circumstances
.
DOLE
Tulong
·Panghanapbuhay sa 29,575,088,000 Ating 13,727,188,000 15,847,900,000.j .00 i Disadvantaged or .00 00
Displaced Workers
Program (TUPAD)
On the other hand, several foreign-assisted infrastructure projects arl.dI
other socioeconomic development programs were transferred from tJ:i_e
Programmed Appropriations to the Unprogrammed Appropriations. '
Notably, of the six major railway projects, which are key components
of the president's flagship infrastructure projects under the Build Better Mo}e
Program, only one was funded under the 2024 GAA, i.e., the MRTl3
Rehabilitation Project.
' The other five railway projects were parti'ally financed through tl[ieI
Unprogrammed Appropriations. However, there was a substantial g~p
between the amounts allocated to these railway projects from tlp.e
Unprogrammed Appropriations in 2024 and the amounts required under the
NEP.
Project 2024 NEP SARO(PHP) Difference i
(PHP) (PHP) !i
: North-South 76.34 billion 22.41 billion364 53 .93 billion
Commuter Railway
System I
i Metro Manila Subway 68.3 7 billion 15.74 billion365 52.63 billion
Project Phase 1
LRT-1 Cavite 4.66 billion 3 .04 billion366 1.62 billion
Extension Project
'
PNR South Long Haul 3.08 billion
Project
364 Annex B (DBM), SARO-BMB-A-24-0004291 dated June 11, 2024. ~
3r,5 Annex B (DBM), SARO-BMB-A-24-0004290 dated June 11, 2024. _;(
366 Annex B (DBM), SARO-BMB-A-24-0004290 dated June 11, 2024 and SARO-BMB-A-24-0017754
dated November 14, 2024.
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.