Court decisionSource checked
276775 Teresita P. De Guzman, et al. Vs. Commission on Audit — Official PDF
276775 — Promulgated July 8, 2026 · 2026 · Supreme Court 2026 / Decision or signed resolution
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
SCANNED TEXT · CHECK ORIGINAL WORDING · DIGITAL P. 13 / 20
Decision 13 G.R. No. 276775
compensation is in accordance with the provisions of the Salary
Standardization Law.
Since the position of general manager is covered by the Salary
Standardization Law, it follows that the same is covered by the provi
sions
of the said law pertaining to the integration of allowances, particularly,
Section 12.thereof...
Accordingly; the prevailing rule is that the allowances of employees covered
by the Salary Standardization Law are deemed included in the standardized
salary, except: (1) representation and transportation allowance; (2) clothing
and laundry allowance; (3) subsistence allowance of marine officers and
crew on board government vessels; (4) subsistence allowance of ho
spital
personnel; (5) hazard pay; (6) allowance of foreign service personnel
stationed abroad; and (7) such other allowances as the DBM may determine.
Notably, the Extraordinary and Miscellaneous Expenses granted by the
Board of Pagsanjan Water District is not among the listed exemptions to the
integrated allowances under the Salary Standardization Law. Neither is
there any showing that the said allowance was determined by the DBM as
one which may be granted to the General Manager of Pagsanjan Water
District.
Verily, the mere grant of authority to the board of directors of a local water
district to fix the compensation of the general manager does not amount to
an unrestrained prerogative to grant salary and allowances wi
complying with the foregoing legislative enactment.”
thout
Paguio goes on to rule that since Presidential Decree No. 198 does not
give local water districts any authority to grant EMEs, such authority must
derive from, and thus be governed by the GAA, following CO
2006-001: : ;
A. Circular
Circular No. 2006-01 prescribes guidelines on the disbursement of
Extraordinary and Miscellaneous Expenses and other similar expenses in
government-owned and controlled corporations and/or government
financial institutions and their subsidiaries. While it recognizes that the
governing boards of such entities are empowered to appropriate
such
amounts as they may deem appropriate for the said allowance, the authority
is qualified. Under Item No. 1, Part Ill of the same circular pertaini
Audit Guidelines, it indicates:
If. AUDIT GUIDELINES
ing to
1. The amount of extraordinary and miscellaneous expenses, as
authorized in the corporate charters of GOCCs/GFls, shall be the
ceiling in the disbursement of these finds. Where no such authority
is granted in the corporate charier and the authority to grant
extraordinary and miscellaneous expenses is derived from the
7% Id. at 499-503
A
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.