Court decisionSource checked
276775 Teresita P. De Guzman, et al. Vs. Commission on Audit — Official PDF
276775 — Promulgated July 8, 2026 · 2026 · Supreme Court 2026 / Decision or signed resolution
Source checked. The source check identifies the document; it does not verify every transcribed word or its current legal effect. Recovered or scanned text may contain errors. Compare the wording and subsequent history with the linked legal source.
SCANNED TEXT · CHECK ORIGINAL WORDING · DIGITAL P. 16 / 20
Decision 16 G.R. No. 276775
compensation under Section 12 of Republic Act No. 6758. Local water
districts as created by Presidential Decree No. 198 are public corporations; as
such, they only have the powers that are granted to them by law, or are
necessary to carry out their purposes. 7% As discussed in Paguio, the
compensation-fixing power of local water districts is controlled by Republic
Act No. 6758 and other issuances governing the compensation of local water
district employees. Thus, the taxation of fringe. benefits under the NIRC
cannot be construed as a grant of authority for local water districts to grant
such non-integrated benefits, moreso in the absence of any express or implied
authority to do so in Section 33 of the NIRC. That provision simply taxes
fringe benefits as defined therein. Also, as the COA-CAR correctly points out,
the EMEs paid to De Guzman, Royeca and Tenedero cannot be considered
exempted fringe benefits under paragraphs 5.4 and 5.5 of DBM CCC No. 10,
as they were authorized long after the June 30, 1989 cut-off date, and the
Board resolutions simply describe them as fringe benefits, without specifying
their purpose or character.®°
Ii.
Anent petitioners’ liability to refund the disallowed amounts, the
Madera rules and its subsequent clarifications apply:
2. If a Notice of Disallowance is upheld, the rules on return are as follows:
a. Approving and certifying officers who acted in good faith, in regular
performance of official functions, and with the diligence of a good father of
7 Davao City Water District v. Civil Service Commission, 278 Phil. 605, 609-617 (1991) [Per J.
Medialdea, En Banc]; Marilao Water Consumers Association, Inc. v. Intermediate Appellate Court, 278
Phil. 444, 453 (1991) [Per J. Narvasa, First Division].
80 Rollo, pp. 50-51. COA-CAR Decision. Paragraphs 5.4 and 5.5 of DBM CCC No. 10 list 23 specific
types of fringe benefits that can remain disintegrated from the standard salary and may continue to be
received only by incumbents as of June 30, 1989 who are authorized and actually receiving said
allowances/benefits as of said date, at the same terms and conditions prescribed by P.D. No. 985, as
amended, namely: Representation and Transportation Allowances (RATA); Uniform and Clothing
Allowance; Hazard Pay as authorized by law; Honoraria/additional compensation for employees on
detail with special projects or inter-agency undertakings; Honoraria for services rendered by researchers,
experts and specialists who are of acknowledged authorities in their fields of specialization; Honoraria
for lecturers and resource persons/speakers; Overtime Pay as authorized by law; Laundry and subsistence
allowances of matine officers and crew, on board GOCCs/GFIs owned vessels and used in their
operations, and of hospital personnel who attend directly to patients and who by nature of their duties
are required to wear uniforms; Quarters Allowance of officials and employees who are entitled to the
same; Overseas, Living Quarters and other allowances presently authorized for personnel stationed
abroad; Night Differential of personnel on night duty; Per Diems of members of the governing Boards
of GOCCs/GFls at the rate as prescribed in their respective Charters; Flying Pay of personnel
undertaking aerial flights; Per Diems/Aflowances of Chairman and Members/Staff of collegial bodies
and Committees; Per Diems/Allowances of officials and employees on official foreign and loca! travel
outside of their official station (DBM CCC No. 10, paragraphs 5.4.1.-5.4.15); Rice Subsidy, Sugar
Subsidy; Death Benefits other than those granted by the GSIS; Medical/dental/optical
allowances/benefits; Children’s Allowance; Special Duty Pay/Allowance; Meal Subsidy; Longevity
Pay; and Teller’s Atlowance Committees (DBM CCC No. 10, paragraphs 5.5,1,-5.5.9). The benefits at
bar were simply characterized as “fringe benefits,” without specifying the type of benefit as enumerated
above. Rollo, pp. 113-114. BWD Board Resolution Nos. 64-2008 and 65-2008.
If your browser cannot display the PDF, use Download original. Original access follows the same document permissions.